Protect Your Computer With The Best AntiVirus Software



Internet these days is certainly not a safe haven any longer. And having the best antivirus software in your computer is a necessity if not a need because each day new methods of devastation are being launched that can totally knock your computer off its feet. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the latest security software.

There are so many antivirus programs these days and each of them are trying to attract a greater chunk of public by publicizing the best side of their software. It really gets difficult to decide as to which software should be installed. Moreover, the question of buying the software or installing it for free also exists.

The best antivirus software should be able to combat against all kind of viruses, Trojans, malware threats and other hideous programs that try to enter your computer usually via the internet and rarely by some USB or other devices that are attached to the PC for transferring data. The antivirus software should recognize and protect all the entry and exit points of the viruses that can cause harm to the computer and also control the spreading of the virus to other computers. As viruses commonly enter the computer via internet, therefore the best antivirus software should have the feature of scanning all the emails and other files that are downloaded from the internet to your computer. In case any file is found to be a threat, it should be instantly blocked or removed from the computer. The antivirus software should also be able to protect your computer from hackers and various other cyber criminals.

Another important feature of the best antivirus software should be less installation time. The antivirus should take less than five minutes to get installed and should then start working automatically. The installation process should be easy. The installation job should finish in just a few clicks. The quicker the software installs, the lesser space it will occupy in your computer’s memory. And the faster will it function.

For an antivirus to be termed as “the best”, it should have the feature of installing automatic updates to the computer. The antivirus should get updated on regular basis and should automatically install updates to protect the computer from the new threats that are being launched every day. The antivirus software should scan any unknown software in your computer to ensure that it can recognize any new forms of virus threats that are being launched.

You can either spend a few extra pennies or purchase the best and latest antivirus software or you can simply download it from the internet. However buying a software, is a much better option than downloading it since free software have limited development budget therefore they might not get updated on new technologies as swiftly as the paid software would.

You will have to do a bit of research to find the best antivirus software. Read a few reviews online. Before you purchase the software, get its trial version, see if you like it and then buy it. Otherwise, just don’t waste money on it.
Read more

DoFollow vs NoFollow Links - Why both links are good


DoFollow vs NoFollow Links - Why both links are good for your Websites

Today I am bringing you this small blog post about why I do personally believe and know by fact that both DoFollow Links and NoFollow Links are good for your Websites.

Now if you already visited my past blogs about What is a Do-Follow link?andWhat is a No-Follow link?You already know that one way of linking will give the Search Engines access to follow the destination inside the link and the other way of linking won’t let the Search Engines follow the final destination inside the link.

Now this is very important if you are really concern about passing Google Page Rank Juice to other pages. If you don’t know what Google Page Rank is and how it works? you can click in there to learn more about that.

You should have already learned that one of the main benefits by using DoFollow Links vs NoFollow Links is that DoFollow Links will pass Google Love and as a result your Page Rank and your Search Engine Result Pages (SERP) can increase more easily.

So, why both DoFollow Links and NoFollow Links are good for your Websites? The important point that I want to give you in here is that it does not matter what kind of link you normally prefer because both links can send you traffic.

Yes Traffic! And traffic is one of the main factors to become successful online. A website without traffic is like having a store in the mall without visitors.

In other words we can say that Do-Follow Links are good for Human Traffic and SEO Traffic.

And on the other side, No-Follow Links are only good for Human Traffic which is still the best traffic you can have.

Remember that the HTML Markup that indicates to the Search Engines to follow links or not are not the only important part in your online success equation.

The big picture in here is that there are going to be humans that will be able to find your links and as you should know they are not Search Engines. They won’t even care about the HTML Markup behind the links.

Are No-Follow Links Irrelevant?


So even that the NoFollow Links won’t pass the Google Love as I explained in my post what Google Page Rank is and how it works?, they are going to be still a huge factor in sending you traffic to your site.

For instance, imaging that you have your own website and you offer online services or online consulting services, and if you visit a blog with No-Follow Links and leave good information inside the blog, people by nature will be more likely to know more about you and who you are.

If you did not know, you can comment inside blogs and leave your link inside your name. This kind of blog commenting can normally bring out a good conversation and debates about any subject.

Unfortunately most blogs these days only offer NoFollow links.




If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

Laptop Under 35000 || Best Laptops Between 30000-35000


Acer Aspire 5750 Ci5 Specifications(Rs:34500)

  • Processor: Intel 2nd Generation Core i5
  • Chipset: Intel HM65 Express
  • RAM memory: 1 GB DDR3,
  • Harddrive: 500 GB, Display: 15.6 Inch
  • Optical Drive: DVD Writer
  • Operating System: Windows 7 Home Basic
  • Resolution: 1366 x 768 Pixel, Screen Type: LED Display
  • Graphic memory: 128 MB, Graphic Processor:Intel HD Graphics
  • Camera: Yes
  • Battery: 6 Cell,
  • Wireless LAN: 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi,
  • Audio and Speakers: Yes,
  • USB Port: 3 x USB 3.0, RJ45 
  • LAN: Yes, 
  • VGA Port: Yes, 
  • Multi Card Slot: Yes

Sony VAIO E Series VPCEB44EN Specifications(Rs:34600)




  • Processor: Intel Core i3
  • Chipset: Intel HM55 Express Chipset
  • RAM memory: 3 GB DDR3, Expandable Memory: upto 8 GB
  • Harddrive: 320 GB, Display: 15.5 Inch
  • Optical Drive: DVD SuperMulti Drive
  • Operating System: Windows 7 Home Basic
  • Resolution: 1366 x 768 Pixel, Screen Type: TFT colour display (VAIO Display Plus, LED backlight)
  • Weight: 2.7 kg , Dimension: 369.8 x 31.1-36.7 x 248.2 mm
  • Graphic memory: 512 MB DDR3, Graphic Processor: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 Graphics
  • Camera: 0.3 Megapixels
  • Battery: VGP-BPS22 Lithium-ion battery, Battery Backup: up to 2.0 hours of use
  • Wireless LAN: IEEE 802.11b/g/n,
  • Audio and Speakers: Monaural microphone,Intel High Definition Audio,Stereo speakers,Dolby Home Theater technology,
  • USB Port: 3 x USB 2.0, Mic In: Yes, RJ45 LAN: Yes, HDMI Port: Yes, VGA Port: Yes, Multi Card Slot: Yes


HP Notebook G4-1200TX Specifications(Rs:34650)



  • Processor: Intel 2nd Generation Core i3
  • Chipset: Intel HM65 Express
  • RAM memory: 3 GB DDR3, Expandable Memory: Up to 8 GB
  • Harddrive: 500 GB, Display: 14.0 Inch
  • Optical Drive: DVD RW
  • Operating System: Windows 7 Home Basic
  • Resolution: 1366 x 768 Pixel, Screen Type: High-Definition LED
  • Weight: 2.50 Kg, Dimension: 376 x 247 x 35.8 mm
  • Graphic memory: 1 GB, Graphic Processor: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
  • Camera: 0.3 Megapixel
  • Battery: 90 W AC Adapter, Battery Backup: Up to 3 hours
  • Wireless LAN: 802.11 b/g/n,
  • Audio and Speakers: Yes, Altec Lansing speakers,
  • USB Port: 3 x USB 2.0, Mic In: Yes, RJ45 LAN: Yes, VGA Port: Yes, Multi Card Slot: Yes


 HP Presario CQ62 452TU Specifications(Rs:29600)



  • Processor: Intel Core i5
  • Chipset: Intel HM55
  • RAM memory: 3 GB DDR3, Expandable Memory: Up to 8 GB
  • Harddrive: 500 GB, Display: 15.6 Inch
  • Optical Drive: LightScribe SuperMulti Drive with Double Layer Support
  • Operating System: Free DOS
  • Resolution: 1366 x 768 Pixel, Screen Type: High-Definition LED Bright View Display
  • Weight: 2.50 Kg, Dimension: 374 x 246 x 31.8 mm
  • Graphic Processor: Intel HD Graphics
  • Camera: 0.3 Megapixel
  • Battery: 65 W AC Adapter, Battery Backup: Up to 3 hours
  • Wireless LAN: 802.11 b/g/n,
  • Audio and Speakers: Digital Microphone,Altec Lansing speakers,
  • USB Port: 3 x USB 2.0, Mic In: Yes, RJ45 LAN: Yes, VGA Port: Yes, Multi Card Slot: 5-in-1 Digital Media Reader

HP ProBook 4430s Specifications(Rs:29200)



  • Processor: Intel 2nd Generation Core i3
  • Chipset: Intel HM65 Express
  • RAM memory: 2 GB DDR3, Expandable Memory: Up to 8 GB
  • Harddrive: 320 GB, Display: 14.0 Inch
  • Optical Drive: LightScribe SuperMulti Drive with Double Layer Support
  • Operating System: Free DOS
  • Resolution: 1366 x 768 Pixel, Screen Type: High-Definition LED Display
  • Weight: 2.04 Kg, Dimension: 339 x 235 x 28.1 mm
  • Graphic Processor: Intel HD Graphics
  • Camera: 2.0 Megapixel
  • Battery: 6 cell, Battery Backup: Up to 3 hours
  • Wireless LAN: 802.11 b/g/n,
  • Audio and Speakers: Digital Microphone,
  • USB Port: 3 x USB 2.0, Mic In: Yes, RJ45 LAN: Yes, HDMI Port: yes, VGA Port: Yes, Multi Card Slot: Yes

Sony VAIO E VPCEH25EN Specifications(Rs:29000)


  • Processor: Intel 2nd Generation Core i3
  • Chipset: Intel HM65 Express
  • RAM memory: 2 GB DDR3, Expandable Memory: upto 8 GB
  • Harddrive: 320 GB, Display: 15.5 Inch
  • Optical Drive: DVD SuperMulti Drive
  • Operating System: Windows 7 Home Basic
  • Resolution: 1366 x 768 Pixel, Screen Type: TFT colour display (VAIO Display, LED backlight)
  • Weight: 2.7 kg, Dimension: 369.8 x 31.3-36.8 x 248.4 mm
  • Graphic memory: 512 MB DDR3, Graphic Processor: NVIDIA GeForce 410M GPU
  • Camera: 0.3 Megapixels
  • Battery: up to 3.0 hours, Battery Backup: VGP-BPS26 Lithium-ion battery
  • Wireless LAN: 802.11b/g/n,
  • Audio and Speakers: Monaural microphone, Intel High Definition Audio and Stereo speakers,
  • USB Port: 4 x USB 2.0, Mic In: Yes, RJ45 LAN: Yes, HDMI Port: Yes, Multi Card Slot: Yes

If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

Make All External Links NoFollow Automatically In Blogger || Nofollow blogspot


Every blogger want powerful SEO for their blogs. You can make your blog Google lover with just making. external links nofollow. NoFollow tag helps your blog to make high ranking in search engines like Google, Yahoo, Bing, MSN etc. After Google Panda Update you will understand the importance of no-follow tag in external links because it is the final hope to secure your PageRanks juice.

Here I want to clear that, Search Engine robots come on your blog or website and they will visit all links placed in your blog post. Its an intelligent to keep those robots on your blog and let them index only your blog posts. This tutorial will guide you "How To Make All External Links NoFollow Automatically In Blogger."



How To Make All External Links NoFollow Automatically In Blogger


  • Go To Blogger Dashboard --> Template --> Edit HTML
  • Backup Your Template Before Making Any Changes
  • Now  Expand Widget Templates
  • Press Ctrl + F and Search The Code Shown Below
  • Now Find the code("</head>") shown below using [ctrl+F]
  • Now Paste The Code Shown Below Just above/Before It 

<script src='http://techtrickbox.googlecode.com/files/nofollow.js' type='text/javascript'/>
<script type='text/javascript'>
<![CDATA[
jQuery('a').each(function(){var a=jQuery(this).attr('href');if(typeof a!='undefined'&&a!=""&&(a.indexOf('http://')!=-1||a.indexOf('https://')!=-1)&&a.indexOf(window.location.hostname)==-1){jQuery(this).attr("rel","nofollow")}});
]]>
</script>

  • Now Save Your Blogger Template & Enjoy :)

If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

Google DFP || DoubleClick for Publishers


DFP i.e DoubleClick for Publishers is a Free comprehensive ad server from Google through which you can sell your ad space available on your website.
DFP Small Business offers a complete toolkit for managing and growing both directly and indirectly sold advertising including streamlined trafficking, advanced forecasting and reporting, integrated revenue optimization, and direct access to the world’s largest pool of advertisers.

With DFP, you will:
  • Differentiate your inventory with advanced targeting capabilities and the ability to traffic a variety of rich media campaigns with ease.
  • Save staff time and reduce costs with simple and efficient trafficking workflow and an intuitive interface.
  • Make better decisions with comprehensive forecasting and decision-support tools.
  • Improve campaign performance and client satisfaction with detailed and actionable reporting.
  • Enjoy responsive, world-class service organization that boasts industry-leading reliability, 24/7/365 support, and flexible APIs for seamless integration.

Sell Your Advertising Space with Google DFP

Say you have a news website (or a blog) where you cover topics such as technology, sports, entertainment and so on. An advertiser wants to serve banner ad campaigns on all your tech related pages. He will pay $20 CPM for all US based impressions  and you can fill your remnant inventory through Google AdSense ads.
Let’s see how we can easily setup such an ad campaign through Google DFP.
Step 1: Create Ad 
We need to tell DFP about the advertising space on our web pages. For instance, in our above example, we’ll have to create three ad slots for the 300×250 rectangle, the 160×600 skyscraper and the 468×60 banner. These are standard IAB units though you are free to define custom ad sizes as well.
Go to DFP – > Inventory – > Ad Units – > New Ad Unit. Give your ad unit a descriptive name so that you can easily determine where exactly that ad unit will be displayed and it’s size. Also check the option “Maximize revenue of unsold and remnant inventory with AdSense.”
new_ad_unit
Step 2: Placements
You have multiple ad units on the same page and there’s a possibility that an advertiser may want to place ads on more than one unit. Therefore, we need to create a placement which is like a group of one or more ad units where an advertiser’s ad can be displayed.
Go to Inventory tab – > Placements – > New Placement and define the placement. To keep things simple, we will associate only one ad unit (the 300×250 one) with our ad placement. Check the option that says “Offer this placement to advertisers” through AdWords and DoubleClick Ad planner to attract more advertisers.
placement
Step 3. Create  Order
Now that we have defined our ad inventory, it’s time to feed in the client’s order. The advertiser will specify where he wants to place the ad, what kind of demographics he wants to target, what’s the price he is willing to pay and how long will the campaign run on our site.
Go to DFP – > Orders – > New Order. Create a company for the advertiser and then fill in the order details under “new line item.” Set the Type to “Price Priority” if you want the highest paying ads to be served on your site. Set Value CPM equal to the price that the client will pay and then add the targeting criteria.
ad_target
Step 4. Upload the Creative Ad 
It’s time for your to upload the “actual ad” that will display on your web pages. You can either upload images, Flash videos or even snippets of HTML and JavaScript in case you’re going with text ads.
Go to DFP – > Line Items and select the “Line Item” that you’ve created in the previous step. Click Add Creatives – > New Creative and upload the image / SWF Flash file. You can even upload multiple creative ads per line item and they’ll display evenly across that site – this helps you determine an appropriate ad copy that performs best with your visitors.
upload_creative
Step 5. Get the Ad Tags for your Blog
We are almost done. All we need to do is get the JavaScript code from DFP and copy-paste it into our blog’s template.
Click the Inventory tab in your DFP dashboard and choose “Generate Ad Tags” – select the appropriate ad unit (the one that we created in Step #1) and choose “Generate Tags.”   Add this code to your website and you're done.
Within 10-15 minutes, the DFP tool should start serving ads on your pages.

If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

Moving Featured Post Slider Widget On Blogger || Marque Post Slider

Did you wanted to have a featured post section in your Blogger blogs? You would have probably noticed that featured sections in the WordPress blogs quite often. People normally use this section to contain their top performing posts, so that they get a further boost up by those extra impressions. As many people tend to read the featured posts, this widget works quite well.But in this tutorial we would discuss about something new kind of featured post widget,moving fetured post slider widget,Hope you already saw that on this blog.So here is the tutorial.

1.Log on to your blogger dashboard

2. Go to your Layout  tab.

3. Click on "Add a Widget" then select "HTML/JavaScript" Widget.

4. Copy and Paste the following code inside the Widget.




<script type="text/javascript">
 var nMaxPosts =5;
        var nWidth = 100;
        var nScrollDelay = 100;
        var sDirection = "left";
        var sOpenLinkLocation = "N";
        var sBulletChar = ">>>";
</script>
<script src="http://techtrickbox.googlecode.com/files/scrollposts.js" 

type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="http://techtrickbox.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=json-

in-script&amp;callback=RecentPostsScrollerv2&amp;max-results=10" 

type="text/javascript"></script>


Customization

  • If you want to add more post then just Change the Number 5 in "var nMaxPosts"
  • Want to Change the Width(in %) of the Slidebar Change the number shown in Pink colour.
  • To change moving speed of Slidebar change number as shown in Green colour.

Now save it and you're done.



If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

Internet Marketing || About Marketing Online


Why use online internet marketing? The reasons are plentiful, but the two biggest concern arrogance and leverage.

 Online Marketing

You should use online marketing for a variety of reasons. If you can figure it out, it gives you the ability to spend your time, not your money, advertising your business. It gives you access to a much broader market than any brick and mortar business. It allows you to kick the crap out of big companies that just throw money at Internet marketing, a tactic often used to crush smaller business in the brick and mortar world.

When you get down to brass knuckles, online marketing not only gives you a level playing field with the big or bigger boys, it gives you an advantage. I like to call this the leverage and arrogance advantage.

Assume you write one piece of great software and try to start a small company in the brick and mortar world. If you are deemed to be a threat by the big software companies, what is going to happen? If you don’t get bought out, they are going to wipe you out. Since you have limited resources and little leverage with retailers, you are screwed, blue and tattooed. Not on the web.
Online marketing is beautiful because it flattens the playing field for all players, big and small. The key is search engine optimization. Regardless of how much money a dominant company in an industry throws at search engine rankings, they will never have an inherent advantage over you. They have no leverage, because there is nobody to buy off. The best they can do is buy advertisements, which most people don’t click. If you get the top ranking on Google, Yahoo and MSN for your keywords, nobody can knock you off unless they do a better optimization job than you do. In no way, shape or form would this ever be possible in the brick and mortar world unless you have a monstrous amount of cash.

The second reason you should use online marketing is arrogance. Dominant brick and mortar companies use marketing firms to push their brands on television, billboards, magazines and so on. When the companies open a site, they often have these marketing firms handle their internet efforts as well. Crushing them on search engines is like taking candy from a baby. They haven’t a clue what they are doing, but their arrogance will never let them acknowledge they are paying triple the going rate for advertisements on high traffic sites. They just throw money at the problem, a strategy that fails every time on the web.

You, however, aren’t going to waste money by purchasing banner ads and other crap that will waste your money. Nope, you are going to pursue search engine optimization on your own or through a credible group. While the dominant company is spending $20 a click for their ads, you are going to be laughing your way to the bank as customers pour in from your top rankings on Google, Yahoo and MSN.

If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

What is Niche Marketing??


Focusing on a niche to the exclusion of everything else is a tremendous way to make money. Here are a few niche strategy advantages you can use.

Niche Strategy Advantages

When we talk about a niche, we are merely focusing on a specific area of a service or product sector. A simple, but clear, example of a niche market would be Lasik eye surgery. It is a niche within the larger field of eye care and much larger field of medical services. The key to making money in your particular area is to focus on a specific niche that provides either a large volume of business or small volume with lucrative profit margins. 
One of the biggest niche strategy advantages is the ability to quickly become a dominant player in the area in question. By definition, there is almost always a limited pool of competitors in the market area, either for the area itself or the geographic limitation. Assume you are offering Lasik eye services. There are a limited number of medical professionals in your area offering the same thing. This means you have an outstanding opportunity to become the dominant personality. You can go get appearances on the local television and radio shows, publish articles in the paper and so on. News outlets are desperate for such quality content.
On the web, the same concept applies with a slightly different orientation. You want to focus on your niche to the exclusion of everything else. This sounds simple, but can be difficult to implement. There is an incredible temptation to expand a site beyond the niche in question. The motivation, of course, is greed. We all tend to think that if we offer tour services to London, our clientele would obviously be interested in buying soccer shirts for the professional teams in London. Wrong. Define your niche and stick to it. Even if you sell a few shirts, you risk distracting your prospects from purchasing a tour. 
The web also provides unique niche strategy advantages found in no other business medium. One of the dominant ways to market any business is to write content for periodicals. I am talking about informative articles, not advertisements. If you wrote an article for the local paper and they included it in their Sunday edition, how would you be viewed? It would be a lot more effective than an advertisement and, over time, you would become a trusted source for most readers. Whenever they thought of your area of expertise, they would come to you or your business. Talk about a goldmine!
On the web, you can take this example to the extreme. There are numerous sites known as article directories. These sites collect articles for an interesting audience. Websites, blogs and online newsletters need content all of the time. They use article directories to find the content. You should submit articles to the directories under the category applicable to your business. If you make the articles informative, you will quickly become a credible source and they will use your articles again and again. It is like being published in your local paper and a few hundred papers in other cities.
Niche strategy advantages are plentiful. Take advantage of these two and you should see excellent results.


If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

best phones 2013 || upcoming top phones


Mobile Phones have become a necessity, long back the only thing we could do with our phones was to receive calls but with the change in time we see new unexpected featured come up in the new phones which tempt us to get that brilliant and beautiful upcoming phones.  Just like fashion keeps changing, the trend in mobile phone also does. No matter how awesome a mobile phone we possess, we also keep looking forward to what’s new in the market. Every year we see upcoming phones to have awesome features that were never imagined earlier and the craze to get the new phone increases. Mobile companies aspires to have the maximum number of customers carrying the mobile phone bearing their company’s name. So we are presented with many new choices every now and then.We would update you here with the mobile phones you can have in your hands tomorrow. Have a look:

10. Sony Xperia T: 

sony xperia t 300x235 Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013
This is one of the most awaited phones. It will have the latest Android 4.0 as its operating software. A dual core processor with 1 gb ram. It is also going to provide a large display screen of 4.55 inches with an awesome 13 mp camera. It is also said to have the latest 4G data service. With a fully capacitive touch screen, this phone promises to be the best of its type.

9. Motorola Droid Razr Maxx HD: 

Motorola Droid Razr Maxx HD 300x283 Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013
Motorola along with the other brands is also in the race of providing the best features available. This new phone is looking forward to provide an OS of Android 4.0.4. With a display screen of 4.7 inches of capacitive touch and with 1 gb ram and dual core processor, this phone also provides a 4G data service and camera quality of 8 mp. A buyer must go through this phone before making his final decision.

8. Nokia Lumia 820:

lumia 822 300x300 Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013
Nokia has now completely switched to windows phone after its OS symbian was found weak in comparison to android OS. Nokia lumia 822 promises to provide windows 8 as its operating software. Alongwith 8 MP camera and a 4.3 inch capacitive touch screen, this phone is expected to have the highest speed among the currently existing phones.

7. Samsung Galaxy Victory 4G LTE: 

Samsung after the completion of note series is planning to launch a decent priced mobile phone. This phone will have OS Android 4.0 with 5 MP camera and a display screen of 4 inches. This phone is scheduled to be a CDMA phone. It is expected to become very popular. Normally users avoid CDMA phones, but this phone will surely force everyone to change their minds and people will surely go for it.

6. Nokia Lumia 900:

Nokia Lumia 910 Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013

Lumia 900 is said to have Windows 7.5 Mango as its OS. With 512 mb ram single core processor, it is said to have a 12.1 MP camera. Its display screen is expected to be 4.30 inches. Its pricing and release date are yet not shared by Nokia but it will soon be in markets. It will have a 4G data service and a battery backup of 7 hrs of talk time and up to 300 hours standby. So go ahead, this is the phone you are waiting for.

5. HTC 8X: 

HTC 8X 230x300 Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013
HTC 8X is rumored to be HTC’s first window phone. It will have a Windows 8 OS. With dual core 1 GB RAM processor. With a camera of 8 MP and a screen of 4.3 inches with 4G data service, this phone claims to be the best phone launched by HTC till date. Although people will on first be a bit hesitant on buying a windows HTC phone as its the first one in this brand but HTC are raising high expectations on this phone and are sure about its high sales.

4. Blackberry London:

Blackberry London has not been officially announced yet. But a few pictures of this phone and few details have been leaked. This phone will be containing its regular blackberry OS. Expected to have a 8MP camera and 1 gb ram with 1500 Mhz TI omap processor. This phone after being leaked has gained a great popularity in market. People are dying for its release and to get hands on it.

3. Samsung ATIV S: 

Samsung Ativ S Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013
With a bundle of windows phone in market, how is it that Samsung has not yet launched one of its. So Samsung ATIV S, phone with windows 8 OS. 4.8 inch screen with capacitive touch and camera of 8 MP. Samsung is also going to provide 4g data service along with dual core processor. This phone is expected to give a tough competition to all the others

2. Nokia Lumia 920

nokia lumia 920 Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013
Nokia’s Premium upcoming Windows 8 smartphone, Lumia 920 is definitely one of the most awaited and amazingly beautiful Windows Phone. The phone is surely going to be hugely successful thanks to Windows 8 Phone Os simplicity and it’s premium design and feel. Nokia Lumia 920 comes loaded with 768 x 1280 pixels, 4.5 inches Pure Motion HD+ Display, Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait Processor, 1GB Ram and 32 GB Internal Storage. But one thing about this upcoming phone which stands out is it’s 8.7 MP Primary Camera which has optical image stabilization so you no longer would get any shaky images. The Phone is expected to be around $600.

1. Apple iPhone 5:

apple iphone 5 Top 10 Best Upcoming Mobile Phones 2012 2013
The Most awaited phone this year is easily The Apple iPhone 5, iPhone 5 would get a bigger 4″ display and a more powerful Processor. iPhone 5 will offer 4G and it will be LTE network compatible. The camera of iPhone 5 will be amazingly powerful 8MP dual led flash. Its storage capacity will be boosted up to 64 gb. Its new iOS 6 is expected to have a digital music locker. The price of iPhone 5 factory unlocked version is expected to start with $699. This Soon to be launched iPhone is for sure the best phone designed ever by Apple.
We hope the information provided  in the article is sufficient for all the readers to choose which phone are they targeting next. So be ready for some amazing pieces to be added on in the market. Comments on the article are welcomed. Any queries related to the article will be entertained.

If You Like Please Comment Bellow
Read more

App showdown: Android vs. iPhone|| Why the Apple vs Samsung $1 billion verdict is correct and should stand


The first U.S. Apple vs Samsung battle has ended in late August, with a surprisingly bitter defeat for the South Korean Android maker – surprising not because Samsung was found to infringe on certain Apple patents, but because of the nature of the total Samsung defeat.
Samsung was found to willfully infringe on 6 from its 7 patent claims Apple brought to this battle against its rival and was awarded $1.05 billion in compensatory damages. Meanwhile, the jury found Apple not to infringe any of Samsung’s patents, including the FRAND, or standards essential, ones.
Sure, the fight is not yet over as the two companies are still duking it out in over 50 cases spread across 4 continents, and there are plenty more battles to be fought until we find a real winner, including at least one more U.S. case – although we’re probably see the two giants settle sooner or later even though that’s not an option right now. And sure, Samsung will appeal this particular decision, while Apple will try to obtain injunctions against various Samsung-based products in the region in the coming months.
But ultimately, the verdict is correct and should stand, in my opinion, and no matter how hardcore an Android fanboy you are or how much you hate Apple for whatever reason, you can’t disregard the fact that Samsung brought this shit storm on to itself by blatantly copying Apple’s devices. And I’ll tell you why in a series of posts based on the Apple vs Samsung lawsuit and all the chatter that followed – yes, this is only the beginning.

A square with round edges

Apple is not selling just a black square with round edges, an unpattentable form factor as so many people seem to believe, and neither is Samsung. If they did, then those devices would look like this:
 
And it doesn’t market a device that has a grid of icons that have round corners and a fixed menu at the bottom of the home screen, and neither does Samsung. If they did, we would have something like this:
If any of the two hypothetical scenarios above were true, then Apple would not have accused Samsung of blatantly copying the design of the iPhone and iPad. But the two companies are selling a variation of these two devices:
Apple sells a black square device that has round edges, a home button, and a recognizable screen that features a grid of apps and an apps dock that stays the same no matter what homescreen you’re in. But that device is protected by a flurry of patents that each describe various functionalities, as a patent can be awarded for everything that’s inside a device like a phone. Together, those functions and design elements make an iPhone. And most of them are protected by patents.
And some of those features and design elements were chosen by Samsung to also make a Galaxy-branded device. No matter how lawyers would break each patent down and try to prove it shouldn’t have been awarded in the first place, the patents combined are meant to defend a device that, when launched, could make or break the company that unveiled it. That’s even if when looking at one patent at a time without viewing the bigger picture, you start to question its claims and validity.
As it turns out, the iPhone became the best Apple product yet and didn’t break the company, which convinced rivals that’s the way to go when it comes to designing smartphones.
It’s an iconic design that makes the iPhone and iPad highly recognizable in stores. And that’s the sort of design that Samsung decided to imitate with its first high-end device that caught the eye of the Android consumer, the Galaxy S, announced at CTIA in March 2010 and launched in several markets in the months that followed.
That design ensured some confusion among users, and don’t tell me that you’ve never heard inexperienced, tech-unsavvy buyers say that the Galaxy S looks like an iPhone, at least from the distance, or when looking at Galaxy S official pictures. If that happened at least once, than Samsung’s job was done, even if some customers quickly realized the differences between the two devices. Samsung created a device that looked like an iPhone and hence was as usable as an iPhone in people’s minds.
Sure, experienced consumers will never confuse the two because they have all the background information they need not to make that mistake. But unfortunately for Samsung, the majority of consumers are not as tech-savvy. And since the iPhone quickly became fashionable among smartphone buyers because of the new features it brought to the table, or because it looked cool – that wouldn’t have happened with a mediocre product – it’s easy to understand how plenty of customers decided to jump on the smartphone bandwagon without necessarily needing a smartphone. Or without knowing what the differences between an iPhone 3GS and a Galaxy S were at the time the latter was launched. In fact, choosing either model in 2010 would have offered you a great smartphone experience, no matter who your mobile allegiance laid with, and let’s remember that those were still the early days of this smartphone revolution.
And sure, Samsung understood the dangerous waters it entered with the device as it started to diversify its upcoming Galaxy-branded devices in the following years in order to avoid clashes with Apple. But the Galaxy S established a bridgehead for the company, which used the iPhone momentum combine with the recent rise of Google’s Android OS to fortune to get a strong foothold in the smartphone marketshare. The Galaxy brand became cool by association if you will, a strategy that helped Samsung rise on top of the business.
No longer was Samsung trying to dethrone Nokia from the number one position in the cell phone market, but the company was fighting against the Apple, the newest comer to the mobile wars, realizing the danger the iPhone maker poses to the future of the smartphone market.

Capturing mind and market share

While Samsung did start to make modifications to its Android devices to avoid clashes with Apple, the damages was already done by the original Galaxy S and its following variations. And from time to time a device like the Galaxy Ace 2 / Ace Plus (an early 2012 device) would pop out reminding people why Apple is suing Samsung. The Galaxy Ace 2 was launched to compete against the iPhone 3GS this year, a device that has been around for more than three years and which was discounted down to $0 with new two-year contracts in the USA once the new iPhone 4S was introduced in October 2011 – it’s not like Samsung didn’t have enough low- to mid-range products to chew away at Apple’s marketshare, but it just had to launch an iPhone look alike in the midst of its legal conflicts with Apple, didn’t it? Of course, by this time even regular smartphone buyers would know the difference between a Samsung product and an Apple corresponding competitor – so there’s no danger of confusing the two anymore, is it?
But would that really matter if the mind of the consumer was already manipulated by devices like the Galaxy S and its successors to believe that Samsung can make smartphones just as good as the iPhone but more affordable – and I’m not saying those devices aren’t or weren’t great choices at their time, or that believing they were highly competitive choices was a mistake.
Just think about the Android ecosystem for a second. Because it’s so volatile in terms of new launches, low- to high-end devices can’t keep their initial price points for more than a few months before carriers and third-party electronics retailers offer discounts. The “older” the device is, the higher the discount. That doesn’t happen in the Apple world, where Apple only discounts its products once a year, during the new iPhone launch, when the older-generation devices receive price cuts. And because the subsidy isn’t cheap, the vast majority of carrier partners prefer not to mess with the price either, to avoid losing any cash with such practices.
So the consumer who started seeing in Samsung a worthy smartphone maker that owns its own highly recognizable brand knows that the Galaxy Insert Name product will be cheaper in one or two months (subsidized version) than its iPhone counterpart that will only get discounted when the next iPhone is released. So then why not buy a Galaxy-branded smartphone instead?
How do you think Apple felt about that?

Galaxy, the most powerful Android brand

Besides realizing that it’s the iPhone that it has to beat, Samsung also saw what other players in the Android world failed to see, the need of a strong brand. The Galaxy S was the first device in its family, and then more and more smartphones and tablets got the Galaxy particle in their name.
Meanwhile, other Android device makers failed to understand the importance of a strong brand, or adapted only later to that need.
Why is branding important? Well, because we always refer to Apple smartphones as iPhone Insert Version not Apple iPhone Insert Version whereas one of the latest Android handsets is called the Motorola Droid RAZR Maxx HD. You know who makes the iPhone and what OS it’s running. But if I were to list HTC’s, LG’s or Motorola’s 2010 Android-based devices, without mentioning the maker, would you know who made them at the time – assuming of course you haven’t covered the mobile environment as thoroughly as I did in the recent years?
It took HTC, Motorola and LG a while to come out with their One, RAZR and Optimus brands, respectively, but they may be too late to the naming game. Samsung has slowly amassed more and more customers and won marketshare thanks to its Galaxy brand, while HTC, Motorola and LG lost buyers. Are Samsung devices superior to the Android competition’s offerings, considering that same-year handsets are sporting almost the same components and same OS version? No, but Samsung managed to ride the iPhone-like-device momentum and build mindshare way ahead of everyone else.
The Galaxy S3, also the scope of a different Apple trial, is rumored to be a lawyered device. It doesn’t look anything like an iPhone, not even from the distance. The same things applies to the Galaxy Note 2 monster. But its popularity among Android users would not have reached current heights among consumers without devices like the Galaxy S and its successors.
Just look at the HTC One X, a high-end device that’s the most important Galaxy S3 rival out there, but which isn’t selling Galaxy S3 like. Maybe because HTC did not copy the iPhone’s design and appearance. Or else Apple would have sued for that too.
And that’s how Samsung rose from quarter to quarter to become the leader in the smartphone market, passing by all other Android device makers in the process, but also Apple, currently in second spot. Not to mention moving past its former mortal enemies, Nokia and RIM, that are trying their best to stay relevant in a post-iPhone smartphone universe.
You may have noticed that I mostly referred to Samsung smartphones and disregarded Samsung tablets so far. That’s because Samsung’s rise started with smartphones, not with tablets. In the tablet market however, even if Samsung has found not to be infringing on Apple’s iPad design, there’s no real need from Apple to push Samsung tablets out of stores, because, let’s face it, Samsung isn’t selling as many units as it would want to. There are other devices that will do that for them, without hurting iPad sales in the process. They are called the Kindle Fire and especially the Google Nexus 7, which are exactly what Apple needs in the Android tablet ecosystem, a fight that can’t be won by regular Android tablet makers competing against budget devices coming from huge content providers like Amazon and Google.

Hindsight is always 20/20

Apple haters will have to remember that without the iPhone, the smartphone may have been be dominated by Symbian, BlackBerry OS and Windows Mobile 6.x for years to come. These “old” mobile OSes look dull in hindsight, but how many of you were checking such smartphones out, or using one when you-know-who arrived. Sure, Android would be in that list somewhere, but would Android have become as popular as it is today, and as fast as it happened with a BlackBerry-like QWERTY keyboard-based non-touchscreen design as it did thanks to the help of a touchscren interface and a rich app ecosystem?
So if it was Apple that reshaped the industry, by hating the iPhone maker and saying it didn’t invent anything new and it doesn’t deserve to sue the competition to protect its non-inventions, one would be partly hating Android too, one of the byproducts – no matter if better or worse – of iOS, or iPhone OS as it was called initially.
That’s what Apple created with the iPhone. It brought a heavily contested design to market and it risked its own money and lots of R&D to create the device and an as-smooth-as-possible user experience. But competitors were not convinced such a device would succeed, and they only came out with Android- and/or touchscren-based devices later in the game when it was clear that Apple was not going to take any prisoners, and that users liked the new thing.

And then Apple was also first to bring out a mobile content store that took off and was immediately followed by Google and others.
Five years later it all looks “obvious,” because the smart mobile devices you have today are all basically similar: they have a square shape with rounded corners and a plethora of apps spread around various home screens in a grid-like manner. But not all of them are “blatantly” copying the iPhone and iPad.
And Apple did not just attack the most popular Android maker out there, as you would believe now. That’s also a hindsight-based statement to make. It attacked them all, at the moment it thought their products to be infringing its own patents. And when it did file suits against Samsung, HTC and Motorola, the first was not the leader of the smartphone univers, the second was not in the world of hurt if finds itself today and the third was not just a patent collection hastily purchased by Google for an exorbitant price.
They were all, at least according to Apple, infringing on its patents. But just one was accused of blatantly copying the iPhone and then the iPad design, while every other suit is about software patents. Is it just a coincidence that the smartphone maker that had the most iPhone-like design, at least in Apple’s view also became the best-selling Android maker out there?

Software patents be damned

Plenty of people believe the U.S. patent system is unjust and that software patents should not be easily awarded for such “obvious” things like some of the features found on Apple’s devices. Sure, there’s only a way to arrange icons on a grid, multitouch is “obvious” and so is “tap-to-zoom.” Although there are plenty of ways not to choose a sunflower as your Photo app icon.
But if they’re so obvious and natural, and if they should be standards – who knows, probably they will be standards in the future, which is certainly how Google would like it – why weren’t they “invented” by Samsung, or Google, or anyone else before the iPhone was launched?
And do you think that had Samsung invented tap-to-zoom or whatever must-have smartphone features you take for granted today, it wouldn’t have been patented? It would have been, and Samsung would have waited around the corner to defend those software patents.
If that’s not enough then how do you explain the fact that almost every Android maker out there has settled with Microsoft, and it’s paying the company royalties for every sold Android device – in fact Microsoft is making more money than Google from actual Android sales, and I’m not including here the ad revenue generated by Android devices? Why didn’t they settle with Apple? Why didn’t they seek a license to use Apple-developed tech?
You know who did do that? Microsoft. The Redmond-based company will launch its own tablet later this year, the Surface, and it looks like Microsoft already has a deal in place with Apple to avoid any future legal proceedings. According to it, Microsoft has to come out with different designs for its devices.
What about prior art, or prior devices that use Apple-like tech that was developed before Apple was granted the software patents it asserts against Android device makers. Why aren’t there any popular gadgets out there pre-dating the iPhone and using the technology that Apple patented erroneously according to some? Because their makers did not pursue these projects and/or were not able to go to market with devices using technologies as found in current smartphones.
And in case you’re annoyed at Apple for over-patenting its devices you’ll have to remember that Apple already went through this sort of thing in the early days of the Macintosh vs Windows computers. It just didn’t want any mobile OS, and probably Windows Mobile was perceived as the most important threat to iOS and iPhone when the original iPhone was launched, to do to its smartphone line what Windows computers did to its Mac line. That’s why Apple filed a patent for every little thing it considered important for the iPhone and iPad experience, without knowing beforehand whether the patent will be awarded or not. It tried to protect its intellectual property, and when the patent was granted it tried to further defend it even if that meant going to court.
Can you blame Apple for doing it? Yes, you can, in hindsight, because you’ll say the company is greedy, wants to turn a profit, doesn’t pay enough taxes, wants to stop competition in the courts, and what not. But did you feel the same about the company before you became an Android fan or before the iPhone was launched? Are you actually blaming Apple for employing certain marketing tactics like generating buzz around overpriced devices to make money? Are you blaming it for its needs to defend the way it’s making money? Aren’t Apple device buyers getting good-quality even if not perfect devices in return for the price they’re willing to pay for the Apple device they choose to buy?
Shouldn’t Samsung be equally punished, morally speaking, for making money at all costs off of its consumers? Just look at this Galaxy Note 10.1 review which reveals how a flagship device is basically an overpriced, sucky device that’s nowhere near the high-end side of the spectrum and which shouldn’t be sold for a high-end price?
Why stop there? Why not go after Google and its privacy-infringing tactics all in the name of better ads and more ad-based revenue – yes, Google, if you did infringe on anyone’s privacy more than once, you can’t call it just an accident anymore. As one famous president hastily said: “Fool me once, shame on – shame on you. Fool me … you can’t get fooled again.” But that’s a different story, for a different day.

And then, there’s the evidence

I have thoroughly covered the Apple vs Samsung trial and I said a bunch of times that Samsung has the work cut out for itself in court where Apple has presented plenty of evidence that questions Samusng’s intentions when creating its own Android handsets and tablets. We’ve seen the 132-page internal report that was making recommendations to Samsung design and engineer crews to adapt the I9000 prototype (the Galaxy S) to better mimic iPhone functionality, we’ve seen the internal “crisis of design” memo, and we’ve seen the Google warnings to Samsung that certain Galaxy branded devices including tablets looked too much like an iOS product.
Meanwhile, Samsung was not able to convince the jury that Apple was infringing on standards essential patents, and frankly I don’t think it had a chance to win anything with these kind of patents – in fact Samsung and Motorola are both investigated for FRAND patent abuse in their court conflicts with Apple, with the former being under scrutiny both in Europe but also in its home country, South Korea.
The verdict is not a surprise considering that between the two it’s Apple that has won the most favorable rulings in most courts to date, including the U.S., with Samsung having a hard time obtaining any positive results against the iPhone maker.

No matter what outcome, the real winners are the consumers

We keep hearing that because Samsung has to pay $1.05 billion to Apple in damages (that may still change in the future, and if it doesn’t, there’s always the pay-by-nickels option), competition is being stifled. That’s hardly the case. Such verdicts, even Samsung’s copying of Apple’s iPhone, are all in our favor as they will further drive innovation.
In fact, we already have proof of innovation happening as the result of several patent infringing events. First, Samsung copied the iPhone with the Galaxy S which showed Apple that companies were ready to catch up to Apple. That meant that Apple had to intensify its efforts and include more and more features in its upcoming devices to stay relevant in a market that was advancing rapidly. And Apple, which has used its client base to expect major improvements every two years or so, may have been compeled to come out with better features in new products than it would have wanted. Maybe Apple’s initial strategy was to come out  with mild updates year after year, but was forced to be more aggressive because of the increasing competition from Android. We’ll never really know. What matters is that Apple had, and still has to keep working hard to still bring out devices that will sell like hot cakes. That’s certainly in our favor.
Whether the verdict is final and Samsung ends up paying Apple the damages as awarded by the jury, or the two companies settle, it doesn’t mean Samsung products will die or that Samsung will lose significant market share. Not at all! In fact, Samsung’s recent products are not exactly iPhone- and/or iPad-like. Just look at the Galaxy S3 and the Galaxy Note 2. Like Apple, Samsung has the money to invest heavily in its R&D department to come up with better mobile devices in the future. Unlike its Android competitors, it can afford to invest a lot more in R&D, not to mention it can further develop Bada in response to the verdict, but also in the face of increasing competition from Google devices like the Nexus 7 and the latest Motorola devices.
In fact, being the number one smartphone maker in the world will bring even more cash to the company, so $1 billion isn’t that much to pay to admit it copied the iPhone. Because Samsung is in no danger of losing sales and market share anytime soon, no matter what the verdict is. It has too many Android devices that appeal to various target buyers to risk becoming irrelevant in the mobile space. It doesn’t even have to admit, ever, that it copied the iPhone even if the jury said so. Because, again, $1 billion is pocket change compared to what Samsung has in its coffers.
As for devices that could get banned in the U.S. or other regions? By the time a final decision is taken on Apple’s ban requests, those devices will no longer be relevant for that market, meaning that Samsung has already sold as many units it could have sold in the U.S. before buyers were wooed by other Android devices, made by Samsung or any other OEMs.
And let’s not forget about other mobile operating systems out there, namely Windows Phone 7 and BlackBerry OS. This sort of legal victories should further motivate companies like Microsoft, Nokia and RIM to work hard at coming back into the game to try to take advantage, if possible, of any temporary Apple-friendly court rulings. We don’t want a mobile ecosystem that has just two options, iOS and Android, we want as many players as possible. as that would really encourage competition. That too is certainly in our favor.

The verdict is correct and should stand

I think I have thoroughly explained why the verdict is correct and should stand. Whether you like or hate Apple and/or Samsung, you should really check out the background and the facts that lead to the verdict in the first place. What you shouldn’t do is feel sorry or happy for either party involved in the trial. These are giant corporations that know what the risks are when playing the game, that can take care of them selves and that can take a $1 billion hit while still coming out on top. Ultimately, it’s the law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest.
There’s no stifling of competition and there’s no good guy. It’s just another day in the mobile business, and the more details you know about it the better you can accept the verdict and move on.
At the end of the day the fact remains you like the mobile device you currently hold in your hands – maybe you’re reading these lines on one. No matter what OS it runs and who made it, chances are it’s a square with somewhat rounded corners and a bunch of icons on a touchscreen display. It may or may not look a lot like an iPhone.
But… it exists because back in 2007 Apple launched the iPhone and then Google caught up to iOS with Android. Then each party tried to beat the other, involving plenty of players along the way. Fast forward to today and you’re holding that device in your hands. Would it be as appreciated if the iPhone wouldn’t have been made? If Android wouldn’t have been open-sourced? If the Motorola Droid and Verizon would not have helped put Android on the map? If Samsung would not have copied the iPhone and prove that Android is a competitive OS? You get the idea, don’t you?
With that in mind, join us in the following parts of this story, as we’re going to look further more at this Apple vs Samsung conflict and why the verdict is correct. And yes, I know this is an Android blog.




Please Comment Bellow If You Like
Read more